 "17th century Churchill's rise to power" | 2008-04-07 |
| - Reviewed By cvrcak1 |
| Ambitious series about early generations of Churchills. Drama spans from the time of King Charles II reign thru King James (his brother), King William of Orange (King James' eldest daughter's husband) to Queen Anne, Princess of Denmark (King James' younger daughter). We meet Sara and John who are the first Chruchill couple that marries out of love during brief courtship on the court of King Charles II. Both love each other deeply but are are driven by desire for success, wealth and political ambition. They are devoted to monarchy and while John rises thru the ranks in the British Army and later government, Sara is devoting her life to serving Princess Anne as her favorite Lady in Waiting. It is interesting to see that living in the court is term of employment and it is amazing that these two have been able to survive thru four very different rulers of England. Over the course of 30 years of living at the court they manage to rise thru the ranks and finally establish themselves as Duke and Duchess of Marlborough. But their hard work and devotion do not come without price. They loose one of their sons early, Sarah ends up being estranged from her daughter. Both Sarah and John get to realize that their marriage is unique and is built on same values and principles. Even their daughter's marriage cannot sustain itself in that fashion. It is interesting to learn about European countries strife for balance of power, royal arranged marriages as means of creating alliances and internal fight between members of the Parlament. It is also interesting to learn how often Kings and Queens are used by their advisors who often have their own interest in mind rather than interest of the nation. Excellent drama about politics at its best. Acting is uneven - especially Susan Hamilton's. Too ofter actors are too old in portraying their characters at certain age. Last disc with the last three episodes seems rushed and superficial. Valuable lessons in friendhip and common ground amongst people of culture that one does not see very much in today's world. |
| |
 "Simply Excellant" | 2008-01-22 |
| - Reviewed By thegeekster |
| TV like this you will rarely see nowadays. No great sets or special effects, just great acting with a ripping good story. What more can I say. |
| |
| "Wigzapalooza" | 2007-04-01 |
| - Reviewed By flipsy |
This miniseries, detailing the rise of the Duke and Duchess of Marlborough and the end of the House of Stuart, was the maiden broadcast of "Masterpiece Theatre"in the United States, and was to set a pattern for many great series to follow. As such series as "The Pallisers" and "I, Claudius" would do after it, the series is anchored by its title characters but really finds its greatest interest in those who surround them: here, a series of Stuart Kings, from Charles II to James II to William III and Mary II to Anne, with the accession of George of Hanover ending the story. The budget isn't quite what viewers of later series would come to expect, and so crowd scenes are hard to manage: thus the battles of Blenheim and Oudenarde and Malplaquet, and the Duke of Monmouth's rebellion, are done pretty much on the cheap. Much more money was lavished on the costumes and perukes, which are quite in abundance, and get more and more spectacular: William III is dwarfed by his enormous periwig, and Mary II looks like a ship in full sail with her collection of giant lace mantillas and silk bustles.
The miniseries doesn't come with many extras, but there is an interesting interview with Sarah Hampshire who famously plays Sarah Churchill: in the interview, Hapshire reveals she did not get along very well with John Neville (who plays her husband), and that he and many of the other actors in the show did not take the miniseries very seriously. She did get the best revenge of living well by winning an Emmy for the role, as well as the last word here, though unfortunately this is not one of her better parts (she is simply too likeable to be a fearsome termagent). Because this was base don Winston Churchill's memoirs of his ancestors, the Duke and Duchess of Marlborough are pretty much whitewashed: in this version, neither ever ask for any money, but just keep getting showered with guineas and gifts by Anne Stuart. The Duke's waverings of loyalty are never self-serving, but always to teach the monarch in power a good lesson, and never amount to much danger for the kings or queens anyway, though the bad ones always take it for ill. Thus the screenplay remakes Mary II, the "faultless queen," into something of a wicked witch, which is not very historically accurate but great fun for Lisa Daniely, who plays her with real zest. The best performers (and the ones who make this really worth seeing) are John Westbrook and Sheila Gish, who make something very complex and moving out of James II and his queen Mary of Modena, and above all the great Margaret Tyzack as the tortured and much wronged Queen Anne. There's a scene fairly early in the series when the well-meaning Anne tries to comfort her distressed pregnant stepmother that is marvelously accomplished by Tyzack and Gish, and this and a few other choice scenes hit just the right note of intrigue and ambiguity for the adaptor seems to aim. But others lose focus and simply parade names and events... and perukes, lots and lots of perukes. |
| |
| "The BBC later learned to do this sort of thing much better" | 2007-02-05 |
| - Reviewed By elainesharon |
| I have a feeling that this series creaked and clunked a bit even when it was first shown. The production values are on the cheap (most of the money seemingly went into wigs), and my experience with the marvelous original 'Forsyte Saga', which was filmed in black and white, bears out my hypothesis that 'cheap', shows itself worse in color than in b & w. In most cases the performances are excellent, especially Susan Hampshire who deservedly won an Emmy for this. John Neville is okay, the acting of James Villiers as Charles II is a bit over the top but keeps the interest going. Without Susan I think the series would have too dull. There is a feature on the DVD with a recent interview with Susan--she does not have fond memories of making this series, and though she tries to be discreet, she clearly had little respect or affection for her male co-star. Susan tells us that, like the Forsyte Saga, each episode was filmed as a play, with no cuts in the tape between scenes--when one character exits, the others carry on, or move to another set, or the camera simply shifts the focus, while the exited actor is backstage changing costumes, in order to return later. This is a period of English history that many people, especially in the USA, know little about, and I was glad to refresh my memory about how important the Catholic vs Protestant succession to the throne, was at that time. I can't give this a rave, but I am far from sorry to have seen it again after many many years. Brava Susan. |
| |
| "The First Churchills" | 2006-04-13 |
| - Reviewed By scheffkg2 |
While watching the first scene of this mini series, I thought that everything that I'd read about The First Churchills was complete rubbish, and I felt inclined to stop watching it right then and there. But I didn't do so, and it wasn't long before my opinion of the series had changed completely--so much so that I watched all twelve episodes in just three days.
While the story centres on John Churchill, the 1st duke of Marlborough, one of the greatest military leaders in British history, and his politically astute wife, Sarah Jennings, The First Churchills is really a survey of British history from the end of the reign of Charles II to the arrival of George I.
There not much that is bad that can be said about the series. The set design is not exactly on par with what most of us expect these days, and the outdoor scenes are not all that convincing, but this is more than made up for by the superb acting of all the main characters, excellent costume design and lively dialogue.
Definitely worth watching. |
| |
 "A Series for History Lovers" | 2005-06-25 |
| - Reviewed By mooran0 |
As Masterpiece Theater's launching series, "The First Churchills" was a landmark for TV viewers desiring intelligent, historically accurate stories. Masterpiece Theater continues as a feeding station for those starved viewers whose choices prior to this were among westerns and unpalatable sitcoms.
So much English history flies by in "The First Churchills" that the viewer may find it useful, as I did, to have background reference material that keeps the characters sorted out.
Winston Churchill reveals his ancestors with truth, tempermental warts and all. The duchess is quick tempered and self-serving even when it causes her husband difficulty with the queen. She defies his wishes as she did her parents' and she pays dearly.
Susan Hampshire won an Emmy for her role, yet I felt uncomfortable with her somewhat overly-strident performance. John Neville, as her husband, played a tough general loyal to kings and queens, and a pussycat at home tolerating her frequent table-pounding. As much as this series is considered a love story, there is not much chemistry between the two lovers. The scenes showing passionate reunions and reconciliations between the two seemed forced and embarassing. Yet that minor flaw may not be noticable to others. It could also be because I had just viewed "The Last KIng", based on the same era, which was a lively romp with decidedly passionate scenes strewn throughout. Regardless, "The First Churchills" is first-rate! |
| |
International Available
