 "I miss using my sd800IS" | 2009-10-19 |
| - Reviewed By User: A3K4XP1LW6H48H |
| This camera accompanied me on many an adventure. Although advances in megapixel range have been made in recent years since its release, this little camera rendered excellent images with vibrant color and definition. I loved the wide angle and image stablization features. It's size was perfect for my travel needs. Unfortunately, it met a premature demise on a trout stream in Argentina. Although it faithfully captured the image of the fish I caught, it has since had major problems keeping it's battery charge, rendering it unusable. Purchase of a new battery didn't solve the problem. |
| |
| "Terrific camera, even better with CHDK" | 2009-09-23 |
| - Reviewed By User: A3V1DYN19UXF4F |
Sharp wide-angle lens, compact design, typical Canon build quality.
I bought this for my wife, who was frustrated with her Casio because of image blurring. With this camera, the optical image stabilization works wonders for her.
What makes Canons an even better buy is the open-source firmware that you can install. Don't worry, it doesn't break the camera and in fact can be removed or bypassed at any time. The firmware, called "CHDK," allows for many additional features that rival big, expensive SLR performance. One feature I enabled with CHDK is a thermometer-style battery capacity gauge at the top of the screen. Now my wife can see exactly how full the battery is, rather than guessing and running out of battery at an inopportune moment.
Great camera! |
| |
 "Canon makes the best cameras." | 2009-07-18 |
| - Reviewed By User: ABIVKBMSIPEDY |
I bought this camera in December of 2007! (wow, time flies!) It was an upgrade from my Canon SD300 4MP (my first digital camera, bought around in 2004. Paid $500 for it! But it was a good investment since I'm still using it, and it's still working the same -- close to 5 years later! I've taken it on many trips and it has taken a lot of beating.) Ironically, this SD800 camera, that was an upgrade for me, was less than half the cost. Was it worth the upgrade for me? Yes. The larger screen, wider lens, SDHC support (SD300's now outdated technology was limited to 2GB), image stabilizer (it was a lot harder to hold still with the SD300, especially when asking people to take pictures for me without using flash; to get around that, it's best to shoot in snapshots and hope that one of them comes out sharp) and the added mega pixels for larger prints/cropping was definitely worth it. However, I don't find the SD300 obsolete because it's still much smaller and still shoots great photos.
Many cameras these days shoot in HD (1080 or 720) now. However, I was surprised to find out the video quality on this camera (max resolution at 640x480) still beats the low-end HD cameras, with poor sensor, that just interpolate to higher resolutions (it looks so awful - I'm talking about you, Mr. Sanyo TH-1!). Even though the video capability on this camera is a bit outdated now, I still find use for shooting with this camera.
Even after all these years, I still love both my point and shoot cameras. It's just a no question that Canon is a leading camera company. I also recently bought an old Canon A-1 35mm film camera (made in the 1970's) and the build quality and technology on it still impressed me. Canon has my trust in cameras. Period. Design, functions, results - they usually don't disappoint.
You really shouldn't be paying $500 for this point and shoot camera now. For that kind of money these days, you should be getting a DSLR with more features. |
| |
| "Good little camera" | 2009-06-24 |
| - Reviewed By dhoskisson |
| Not much to add from other reviews. I read about it on Ken Rockwell's site, sounded great, bought it. Love the wider angle lense than other point and shoots. HOWEVER, I bought it for $300 in 2007, but I see it is currently listed at over $500. Don't buy it for that price. At $500, it should be made of gold. |
| |
| "My favorite compact digital" | 2009-06-10 |
| - Reviewed By User: A13ST46D9DMD83 |
| I'm partial to Canon compact digitals, but I prefer Nikons for digital SLRs. This camera is great. Image stabilization works well. There is minimal lag after pressing the shutter. This is the widest lens you can find in a compact Canon camera. Check out Ken Rockwell's reviews and guides on his site. It's better to read his stuff and see his examples instead of trying to read some boring manual. |
| |
| "Excellent pics, fast camera with a wide-angle lens!" | 2009-04-27 |
| - Reviewed By User: A1Z14FZ73UELE0 |
| The wide-angle was the most important factor which made me go for this model than other Canons. This is THE best camera I've used. I also have a Panasonic Lumix TZ3 which is also a wide-angle camera, but Canon wins in everyway. The pics are stunning, and because of this point-n-shoot, I bought a Canon DSLR (rather than a Nikon). The camera is also fast and the available user modes are sufficient under most conditions. I also like the macro images with this camera. I would recommend this product readily, or udated versions that will come in the future. |
| |
