Reviews Written By: A2O9JQ06QNRFF3provided by Amazon.com |
![]() | ||
| Santana - Carlos Santana & Buddy Miles: Live! | ||
![]() | "Hasn't improved in 35 years" | 2007-12-06 |
| This was the first album I traded in way back when. I just played it on a streaming service to see if I was wrong. I wasn't.
Pointless riffing, overdrawn song endings, endless repetition, meandering instrumentals, too much inter-song crap (including 3 minutes of band tuning at the start of "Free Form"). Songs don't really resolve, they just end when everyone gets tired of playing. There are much better versions of "Evil Ways" out there; this one is OK, but seems rushed and I'm not that fond of Miles' howling throughout. I truly don't get the 5-star reviews of this. I've never been that stoned, including when I bought this new. If "Hey man, lets get together and jam." is your thing, then maybe you'll dig this. I don't. Oh yeah, it's miked badly too. | ||
| In the Garden of Iden | ||
![]() | "Interesting premise ruined in a bad book" | 2007-11-08 |
| This review contains slight spoilers. Wow a book that actually summarizes itself (pg. 239): "How could millennia-old superbeings be so boring?" Indeed! Baker's premise was interesting: an organization of immortals travels back in time to preserve things that they deem preserve-worthy. This includes mortals who they convert into immortal cyborgs to serve as their operatives. If only she had developed this premise in the book, but no, it turns into a silly historical romance between Mendoza - a supposedly highly trained operative - and a stiff (pun intended) mortal, Nicholas, who sees God in every orgasm. Foul ! - a romance novel masquerading as a Science Fiction work! It seems that Baker forgot about the science fiction somewhere after the first 5 chapters or so to bore us with an improbable historical romance set in the counter-reformation of 16th century England. The book ends with Mendoza being reassigned to the crumbling Aztec world - oh boy, Baker can perpetuate this by transporting the historical romance to a new location. Please spare me! From the point where you discover the dumb title pun - most of the book is set at the estate of Walter Iden, with its magnificent gardens - this dull, grind of a book becomes very, very bad. The characters are shallow, never developed enough for the reader to discover, or very much care about, their motivations. The mysterious Company that, more or less it turns out, controls the immortals is never developed at all. We are given no clues about its motivation or purpose, much to the detriment of the story. Another reviewer used the term "dimensionless", which is apt in so many ways. I found little to like about this book, other than the premise. The characters are thinly drawn, predictable, and one dimensional, creating no emotional attachment for the reader. The flow of the book is inconsistent, it d-r-a-g-s for 200 pages while Mendoza and Nicholas do it in every alcove of the estate and we endure an - admittedly well researched - history of religious conflict in Reformation England, then zips to a denouement where the plot turns too abruptly, the mortals meet their various ends and the operatives move on. Yes, it's as interesting as it sounds. Yawn.... I was surprised to learn that the author is an authority on Elizabethan English as I thought that the dialect was faulty: too many 20th centuryisms seemed to work their way into the dialog. Alas this book seems to suffer from a malady that afflicts Science Fiction writers today: it was written with sequels in mind, rather than developed into a coherent work of fiction. Can no one in this genre write an engrossing work that is self-contained? This is a silly, poorly-written romance that wastes an interesting premise. Avoid it; there are better things to read (and so little time)! | ||
| In the Garden of Iden: A Novel of the Company | ||
![]() | "Interesting premise ruined in a bad book" | 2007-11-08 |
| This review contains slight spoilers. Wow a book that actually summarizes itself (pg. 239): "How could millennia-old superbeings be so boring?" Indeed! Baker's premise was interesting: an organization of immortals travels back in time to preserve things that they deem preserve-worthy. This includes mortals who they convert into immortal cyborgs to serve as their operatives. If only she had developed this premise in the book, but no, it turns into a silly historical romance between Mendoza - a supposedly highly trained operative - and a stiff (pun intended) mortal, Nicholas, who sees God in every orgasm. Foul ! - a romance novel masquerading as a Science Fiction work! It seems that Baker forgot about the science fiction somewhere after the first 5 chapters or so to bore us with an improbable historical romance set in the counter-reformation of 16th century England. The book ends with Mendoza being reassigned to the crumbling Aztec world - oh boy, Baker can perpetuate this by transporting the historical romance to a new location. Please spare me! From the point where you discover the dumb title pun - most of the book is set at the estate of Walter Iden, with its magnificent gardens - this dull, grind of a book becomes very, very bad. The characters are shallow, never developed enough for the reader to discover, or very much care about, their motivations. The mysterious Company that, more or less it turns out, controls the immortals is never developed at all. We are given no clues about its motivation or purpose, much to the detriment of the story. Another reviewer used the term "dimensionless", which is apt in so many ways. I found little to like about this book, other than the premise. The characters are thinly drawn, predictable, and one dimensional, creating no emotional attachment for the reader. The flow of the book is inconsistent, it d-r-a-g-s for 200 pages while Mendoza and Nicholas do it in every alcove of the estate and we endure an - admittedly well researched - history of religious conflict in Reformation England, then zips to a denouement where the plot turns too abruptly, the mortals meet their various ends and the operatives move on. Yes, it's as interesting as it sounds. Yawn.... I was surprised to learn that the author is an authority on Elizabethan English as I thought that the dialect was faulty: too many 20th centuryisms seemed to work their way into the dialog. Alas this book seems to suffer from a malady that afflicts Science Fiction writers today: it was written with sequels in mind, rather than developed into a coherent work of fiction. Can no one in this genre write an engrossing work that is self-contained? This is a silly, poorly-written romance that wastes an interesting premise. Avoid it; there are better things to read (and so little time)! | ||
| Buddy Holly - The Buddy Holly Collection | ||
![]() | "Still waiting for a comprehensive boxed set" | 2007-10-24 |
| I begrudgingly have to give this 5 stars because it's the best we can do, but...
Why on earth is there no comprehensive boxed set of this seminal rock legend? There was a decent LP boxed set that has never been released on CD, I'd even settle for that. Come on, his career wasn't that long - though incredibly influential - why don't we have a boxed set that gives us virtually all of the original recordings remastered in original format? He and we deserve it. | ||
| The Best Poems of the English Language : From Chaucer Through Frost | ||
![]() | "(minus the 20th Century)" | 2004-03-17 |
| The book was just released today, so, no I haven't read all 1000 pages yet. Bloom does not shy away from strong opinions, so many readers either love or hate him. Looking past the bluster, he is erudite and his prefaces to the poets and poems are usually interesting and often enlightening. He asserts that this book was a labor-of-love; his stated goal was to produce the anthology he has "always wanted to possess." Given this goal, it is hard to quibble with much of his selection, though much of it will already exist in your library if you are a serious reader of Poetry. If you are not, this book will serve as an excellent introduction to pre-Modern Poetry written in English. Why Pre-Modern? Because Bloom limits himself to poets born before 1900. This seems like a silly restriction on a book that purports to be the "Best Poems of the English Language". The list of poets this excludes is extensive, but excludes Dylan Thomas, Sylvia Plath, Seamus Heaney, Elizabeth Bishop, Theodore Roethke, Philip Larkin, Derek Walcott. Unfortunately, Dr. Bloom does not explain his choice to end with Hart Crane, but does add that if he didn't the book would include poets from Canada, the West Indies, Australia, New Zealand and Africa. As it is, all poets are English or American - or Americans who wished they were English. This restriction also results in the book containing no black poets and only 11 women (with mainly short selections). Bloom is steadfast in his rejection of "extrapoetic" reasons for including a poem: "Literary history is irrelevant... as are all considerations of political correctness or incorrectness. The best poems published by women before 1923 are here, chosen entirely on the basis of their aesthetic value." This may partially explain his choice of 1900, it helps avoid these considerations. It also avoids the editorial choices necessary to keep the book from becoming 2000 pages. So, the poems are [mostly] great and I enjoy Dr. Bloom's commentary, but do find fault with the arbitrary exclusion of many great poems produced in the 20th century, including works by minorities and poets from other English-speaking countries. | ||
| Johnny Cash - Unearthed | ||
![]() | "Some gems, some chunks of coal" | 2004-01-21 |
| Come on people, just because you like a disk does not mean it merits 5 stars. Really. 5 stars implies near perfection, Unearthed doesn't qualify. Don't get me wrong, I love Johnny Cash and like this set a great deal, but will admit its flaws. I would say that this set is pretty much for Cash collectors and not for a casual interest. I recommend it highly for the former, hardly for the latter. It captures a stage in a performer's life that rarely gets attention - the twilight years - and for that alone it is valuable, but the 4 standard American CD's do this as well. First, the good points: Then, the bad: The bottom line is that this would have made a great 2 CD set, but for a Cash collector some of the less good material is also interesting. The 4th (Hymns) disk should have been issued separately for anyone with that interest; the 5th shouldn't be there at all. If you listen carefully, you can hear the bottom of the barrel being scraped. | ||
| The Vintage Book of Contemporary American Poetry | ||
![]() | "A Great Anthology" | 2003-05-14 |
| This is a great anthology of later 20th C. American poets and a great book to use for a poetry reading group, because the selection for each poet is sufficiently long to provide a good introduction. It inspired me to acquire books by many of the individual poets. I would prefer that the poems be dated and would greatly prefer it to be available hardbound - it deserves the permanence in my library. McClatchy's editing of this and Contemporary World Poetry is outstanding! | ||
| The Vintage Book of Contemporary World Poetry | ||
![]() | "Another gem" | 2003-05-14 |
| Given the daunting task of selecting from, literally, a world of poets, McClatchy succeeds admirably. Once again his editing has me running out to buy individual books by the poets in the anthology. Now if he would do a book of "Contemporary English Language [But Non-American] Poetry" to offer closure.... An aspect of McClatchy's editing that I like is that the selection per poet is large enough to get a good introduction - the opposite is a fault of most anthologies - though this does cause worthy poets to excluded. I would love for some publisher to publish this and Contemporary American Poetry in good hardbound versions. They are prized members of my library, but, sadly, are not durable. | ||
| Merle Haggard - Serving 190 Proof | ||
![]() | "Just doesn't get any better" | 2002-11-17 |
| This album has a permanent place in my "desert island disks". A top candidate for the best country album of all time. With the exception of the mawkish "Sing A Family Song", it is one great song after another. Hag delivers each song with acuity and makes you a believer. The band is tight and contributes plenty interesting moments. I've always admired Hag for stepping outside the confines of traditional country arrangements (adding horns for example) and having the wisdom of assembling great players and letting them play. Bookmarked by perfect, melancholy songs, "Footlights" and "Roses In the Winter", my favorites also have to include "Driftwood", for its great flat picking, and "Heaven Was A Drink of Wine", for its witty pathos. This album showcases Hag at his best and it just doesn't get any better. It belongs in everyone's CD cabinet. | ||
| John Lennon - Rock 'n' Roll | ||
![]() | "Beneath him" | 2002-08-07 |
| Only "Stand By Me" is worth having. The rest are forgettable and perhaps even regrettable. John's performance is perfunctory; Spector's production is awful [is that a sax or a kazoo?]; the arrangements add nothing; though there are some good musicians credited, the playing is unimaginative. I don't even think the concept was worthwhile. He would have been better advised to work a couple of these moldy-oldies into albums of original material. I *am* a die-hard Lennon fan, but would rather this project had been left in the can. Note: there are other songs from this session available - "Angel Baby" is one - they are no better. | ||
| The Allman Brothers Band - The Best of the Allman Brothers: Hell & High Water | ||
![]() | "OK country-rock, weak ABB" | 2002-06-19 |
| This does sound somewhat like the ABB, but what an inferior product. I generally like it when a band attempts stylistic changes, but the female choruses and horn solos in these efforts just don't ring true. And fiddle? *Hell & High Water - were they aware that they were borrowing the melody of "Will The Circle Be Unbroken?" ? Choruses sound out-of-place, but otherwise the song is OK * indicates the songs I consider decent, though none are great I agree with the assessment that Arista was looking for another Doobie Brothers. It's odd what expectations can do; I would like these songs better on a Marshall Tucker Band or Outlaws disc, but the ABB were capable of so much more. Almost the whole CD sounds like an ABB imitation, the solos are derivative of older - and better - songs, the lyrics are rehashes, the arrangements are often too pop sounding. Some cuts have the characteristic ABB drum sound, guitar scale bridges and vocal growling, but it sounds perfunctory. Being a longtime ABB fanatic, I want to totally hate this CD, but it is listenable - just not inspired. Approaching this as a Country-Rock disc and not a typical ABB disc allows objectivity, but hearing merely OK material from a great band is a let down. I can't say that I'll play it much. | ||
| © 2008 GoSale.com (S2) |






