Reviews Written By: A389258EAM3PVAprovided by Amazon.com |
![]() | ||
| APPLE M9404LL/A AppleCare Protection Plan for iPod | ||
![]() | "Caveat emptor" | 2006-12-29 |
| I am always leery about paying extra for so-called extended warranty/protection plans for electronic goods, as for the most part, the products last longer than the time frame that is covered. However, I did relent to buying this because I had read the coverage was a worthy investment for those who use iPods a lot (i.e., like an everyday item or so). So soon after I bought a new iPod, I purchased the protection plan from Apple's website. Needless to say, I missed one little bit of fine print about exactly what is covered, or rather, what is NOT covered. As it turns out, I found that their LCD screen is not very hardy, and apparently, too expensive to replace or repair. I'm not referring to the early Nano models that got scratched easily; I had a 5G, 60 GB model. It worked like a charm for a couple months until I accidentally bumped into something while it was strapped to me. It wasn't even hit that hard. But I noticed the internal display was now cracked, making portions of the screen illegible. The next day, the screen was "dead," meaning while the backlight still worked, nothing was displayed on the screen. Of course, Apple refused to take care of that problem, so I blew $60 for a warranty that is totally useless. And I might as well consider the iPod a $400 loss as well, as it's impossible to use without a display. (As of now, I'm going to relegate this POS to one of those companies that buy broken iPods.) Apple's website gives a really good sales pitch about their protection plan, like you're getting world-class service and peace of mind. I received neither. | ||
| Canon i950 Photo Printer | ||
![]() | "A very good printer...when it's still in rather new condition" | 2006-06-25 |
| After checking out the mostly favorable reviews elsewhere and here on Amazon, I bought the i950, back in 2003. How could I go wrong? Canon's specialty has always been in photographic technology, so this seemed like a good purchase. Indeed, I was quite pleased with the print quality; a lot of the photos looked just as good as if it had been developed professionally. It did need the occasional maintaining (print head alignment, cleaning/deep cleaning, etc.) to keep photos at their optimal look. It was nothing that required me to go to a Canon dealer or anything like that. After awhile, I started using generic ink, mostly out of cost concerns. For the price of one Canon ink cartridge, you can get a full set of generic. This didn't prove to be a problem, the cheap ink looked fine, albeit occassionally more robust, and sometimes the color would be a tad off. But there wasn't any major problem otherwise. After three years of moderate use, however, I am running into similar problems other users have mentioned. My i950 prints out streaks now, depending on the color combination or shading. The best way to describe it is that it looks "interlaced" (think of those lines when you're watching something on TV). These are not random streaks, but rather it affects certain sections in its entirety. Doing all the necessary cleaning (including the alcohol method mentioned elsewhere here), print head alignment, changing ink cartridges -- even using Canon's own -- hasn't rectified the problem. And no thanks, I am not going to put down more $$$ to have the print head replaced. I'll use that money towards another printer. Which model, I'm not sure. I don't know if this streaking thing is a Canon problem in general, although the last time I owned a Canon printer before the i950 was their BJ-200 model (bubble jet, black ink). It too started off very well at first, but became practically useless when the streaking took over. The print head replacement for that one would have cost more than what was paid for the printer. I can't say the experience has made me wary of Canon products, but I really would like something that lasts a bit longer. | ||
| Sony SRF-M80V S2 Sports Walkman Arm Band Radio with FM/AM, TV and Weather Channels | ||
![]() | "Sony used to make better products than this" | 2006-03-28 |
| For a product designed for "sports" minded people, this radio doesn't seem to be designed sturdy enough to take that kind of usage. It's lightweight, which in theory makes it easy to take along wherever you go. And to this, it runs on two-AAA batteries, so we're not bogged down by the weight of the traditional AA batteries. That in itself is a drawback. The battery life just doesn't cut it. If you used this as an everyday item, you would certainly change batteries far more too often than you would like. The battery life is also based on what you're listening to. AM stations use less juice than FM or TV. Although the digital tuning and the option of assignging your favorite stations is nice, the drawback is that you have a certain timeframe between changing batteries, otherwise everything is wiped from memory, meaning you also have to reset the clock, too. I also find the reception is best either outdoors (the whole purpose of a sports radio) or places where there isn't any electronic equipment. The radio is really suspectible to interference from all sorts of devices. Otherwise you'll hear a lot of static and disrupted sounds. The TV tuner is also a good addition, but not very handy if you live in areas where reception is poor or even still, live in one of those places where all the major stations are carried on the UHF bandwith! I'm also one of those types that have always found having weather channels on the radio a rather pointless addition. For me, it never gets used -- I always get my weather from the local news station. For others who really must know the weather wherever they go, it'll probably be an asset. Lastly, the headphones does its job, but I've found with the thin wires, it's always getting tangled or I'm accidentally flinging the headphones off while moving around. | ||
| The Annotated Screenplays (Star Wars, Episodes IV-VI) | ||
![]() | "Feel the Force" | 2004-03-23 |
| If there was one flaw to the book is that it doesn't really contain the "screenplays" of the classic trilogy, per se. It's really a word-by-word, scene-by-scene *transcript* of the movies as we know them, including the material added for the Special Edition. It would have been nice if the book contained, for example, the final written draft of the screenplay, and then annotated with the changes in the dialogue and settings made during filming. All three films had a lot of extra stuff that was filmed but not seen in the final cut, although some of it is referred to in this book. The novelizations of the film do contain many of these "cut scenes" (i.e., Luke hanging out with his friends in Star Wars, more training with Yoda in The Empire Strikes Back, etc.). This book should have included all those cut scenes from the actual screenplay and explained why they were cut (i.e., for running time, because the f/x wasn't working, they felt certain scenes weren't needed etc.) Perhaps we will get to see all of that when the classic trilogy makes its way to DVD later in 2004... Too bad that some of the comments that Lucas said (when he made these comments in 1997) made the prequels sound more promising than what's been delivered so far. | ||
| Enya - Only Time: The Collection | ||
![]() | "Good starting point if you're new to Enya..." | 2004-01-30 |
| While I have been a longtime Enya fan (since 1992), I have the same sentiments as a few others concerning this boxed set. The music is very good and all, but...why can't there be anything really new/obscure? Every few years when she releases a new album, her record label "thoughtfully" decides to re-package the majority of her songs from all the albums into a new set. But they include very little new material. This is not unlike the trend during the '70s after The Beatles broke up. Their label re-packaged all their songs into a bunch of different "greatest hits" albums. All those songs were readily available on their respective albums, and for the most part, there was nothing new to be found each time. The same goes with this Enya set (and her previous ones as well). There are a LOT of great non-album tracks out there which really need to be included here. Many of these tracks are easily obtainable on import CD-singles at a rather hefty price. Sometimes you have to fork over around $10 or more just for one or two new songs (and that can add up very quickly over time!). Also, another major issue that the U.S. distributor almost always short changes the consumer! They want to milk out as much as they can out of popular artists just so you buy more product. Why, for instance, does the Japanese version of the same albums contain extra tracks, while the U.S. doesn't? If you're a member of Columbia House's CD club and have the need for this Enya set, buy it from them. It's usually listed as 40% off the retail price. | ||
| MVP Baseball 2003 - Windows | ||
![]() | "Quite a bit of fun" | 2003-06-28 |
| If you're a baseball fan, you'll certainly enjoy this. It very much has a "you are there feel," thanks to outstanding graphics (I prefer playing with the classic center field camera POV, rather than the more popular "catcher cam" one), pretty good game play, and play-by-play commentary. The commentary can get redundant after awhile, and I have no idea what this "can of corn" analogy refers to. Rather than go through all the good points which have already been mentioned, I wish more miscellaneous features were included and would be implemented in a future version. While I understand the designers decided to focus on mostly on the action so as not to bore the player, I would like to see, for instance, the catcher throwing the ball back to the pitcher, rather than having the ball mysteriously materializing in the pitcher's hand every time! Also, where are the coaches and manager? Yes, a team's staff can change at any given moment, but if you have the options to trade players so they appear in different uniforms, why can't they do the same for managers/coaches? I'd like to see managers visiting the mound when the pitcher starts to become inefficient. And views of the bullpen, so the announcers would say, "Now warming for [particular team], [relief pitcher.] In-between innings, they should also have the box score in addition to the upcoming players for the inning. And when a player comes up for bat a second (or more) times, I want to see the stats for the current game, not the updated batting average and such. There should also be more signature calls to their respective stadiums. It's rather generic to hear: "and it's off the wall!" when you're playing at Fenway Park and the ball bounces off the Green Monster. When you hit a dinger at Yankee Stadium, why not mention when it lands in Monument Park? And why are players so complacent about an ump's call? Can't they argue and even get thrown out of the game if they get too far? There should be more camera angles and also a more active crowd. Why every stadium seems to be sold out is beyond me, no matter how bad a team is. There should be some kind of random element to this, based on how well they're performing in the standings. There should be some views of the crowd during the game, like the "real" game itself. It gets boring when MVP 2003 is all game, but lacking the bells and whistles that the "real" version has. The players don't always respond correctly. When you see instant plays of dingers, you see the pitcher running and reacting like a normal base hit had occurred. Most pitchers usually stand on the mound, turn around to look at the trajectory, and hope it's not gone. :) Also, the fielders tend to be too proficient for their own good. A lot of them seem to run toward the ball, with the back facing home plate, rather than simply taking a few steps back to make the catch. If you hit a foul down the first base line, the first basemen turns towards the area of the ball and extends his mitt, as if he was going to catch it. Another thing missing is when the home team gets a winning run in the bottom of the 9th or extra innnings. It's especially annoying when you get the proverbial walk-off homer. The announcers just talk away before duly mentioning that the homer is hit and that the game is over. I'd like to see more jubliation on the field, not just the team clapping for winning every game. And the losing team should show more emotion, too, not just linger on the field. They should be dejected, heads bowed, sitting in the dugout ready to eat their towel, etc. Weather and other elements (ballboy/ballgirl, flying debris, birds, etc.) should also be included. And the scoreboard for stadiums should be worked on so they show real information. And during the game, they should flash scores in progress, so you have an idea where your team is. Not every stadium uses fireworks, so it is out of place seeing it just about every time. When a player is injured, show it! Show them reeling in agony or trying to walk off their injury. A simple message that a player is hurt and is being replaced doesn't cut it. I suppose I'm pushing it by wishing confrontations between teams (i.e., the dugouts empty) would be included, but I guess they really need to keep the game family friendly. Otherwise signature fan chants from certain stadiums would've been included. :) It's still a pretty fun game regardless of the trivialities I wish were included. ;) | ||
| Bernstein: Candide Overture/Symphonic Dances/Symphonic Suite/Fancy Free | ||
![]() | "Terrific performances" | 2003-01-26 |
| I bought this CD a few years ago just to for the "Symphonic Suite from On the Waterfront," which is one of my all-time favorite classic film scores. The NYPO's performance is very robust and energetic, and easily the best version available of the piece. Bernstein recorded this same piece again many years later with the Israel Philharmonic, but I found it lacking the same drive and passion as the earlier one. The NYPO really captures the mood of New York and the struggle of the dockworkers, as Bernstein envisioned for the film. And they also splendidly perform the love theme, too. The rest of the album is also very good, but they're largely his standards that you've probably once too often. "On the Waterfront" is certainly a treat for any fan of film music from Hollywood's Golden Age. One can only imagine what it would have been like had Bernstein scored more films, but apparently the experience he had (music was cut or removed around in the film) made him think twice. But this CD is a winner. | ||
| © 2009 GoSale.com (S1) |





