Reviews Written By: AJO24K1MUFCKMprovided by Amazon.com |
![]() | ||
| Total Recall | ||
![]() | "Great movie, very poor Blu-Ray quality -- grainy picture, few extras" | 2009-06-28 |
| Fantastic movie, but this is the poorest-quality Blu-Ray image quality that I have yet seen. I traded in my Special Edition DVD of this movie for the Blu-Ray version with the expectation that the new version would have high-definition video and at least a few of the Special Edition's extras. Not so. The video is very grainy and spotty, almost like watching a videotape recorded in a theater with the camera pointed at the screen. The disk includes a single featurette and none of the commentaries or other extras that were included in the Special Edition. If you possibly can, don't buy -- wait for a fully remastered and restored Blu-Ray which includes the commentaries. | ||
| Total Recall | ||
![]() | "Great movie, very poor Blu-Ray quality -- grainy picture, few extras" | 2009-06-28 |
| Fantastic movie, but this is the poorest-quality Blu-Ray image quality that I have yet seen. I traded in my Special Edition DVD of this movie for the Blu-Ray version with the expectation that the new version would have high-definition video and at least a few of the Special Edition's extras. Not so. The video is very grainy and spotty, almost like watching a videotape recorded in a theater with the camera pointed at the screen. The disk includes a single featurette and none of the commentaries or other extras that were included in the Special Edition. If you possibly can, don't buy -- wait for a fully remastered and restored Blu-Ray which includes the commentaries. | ||
| Total Recall (Special Limited Edition) | ||
![]() | "Great movie, very poor Blu-Ray quality -- grainy picture, few extras" | 2009-06-28 |
| Fantastic movie, but this is the poorest-quality Blu-Ray image quality that I have yet seen. I traded in my Special Edition DVD of this movie for the Blu-Ray version with the expectation that the new version would have high-definition video and at least a few of the Special Edition's extras. Not so. The video is very grainy and spotty, almost like watching a videotape recorded in a theater with the camera pointed at the screen. The disk includes a single featurette and none of the commentaries or other extras that were included in the Special Edition. If you possibly can, don't buy -- wait for a fully remastered and restored Blu-Ray which includes the commentaries. | ||
| Total Recall | ||
![]() | "Great movie, very poor Blu-Ray quality -- grainy picture, few extras" | 2009-06-28 |
| Fantastic movie, but this is the poorest-quality Blu-Ray image quality that I have yet seen. I traded in my Special Edition DVD of this movie for the Blu-Ray version with the expectation that the new version would have high-definition video and at least a few of the Special Edition's extras. Not so. The video is very grainy and spotty, almost like watching a videotape recorded in a theater with the camera pointed at the screen. The disk includes a single featurette and none of the commentaries or other extras that were included in the Special Edition. If you possibly can, don't buy -- wait for a fully remastered and restored Blu-Ray which includes the commentaries. | ||
| Total Recall | ||
![]() | "Great movie, very poor Blu-Ray quality -- grainy picture, few extras" | 2009-06-28 |
| Fantastic movie, but this is the poorest-quality Blu-Ray image quality that I have yet seen. I traded in my Special Edition DVD of this movie for the Blu-Ray version with the expectation that the new version would have high-definition video and at least a few of the Special Edition's extras. Not so. The video is very grainy and spotty, almost like watching a videotape recorded in a theater with the camera pointed at the screen. The disk includes a single featurette and none of the commentaries or other extras that were included in the Special Edition. If you possibly can, don't buy -- wait for a fully remastered and restored Blu-Ray which includes the commentaries. | ||
| Total Recall | ||
![]() | "Great movie, very poor Blu-Ray quality -- grainy picture, few extras" | 2009-06-28 |
| Fantastic movie, but this is the poorest-quality Blu-Ray image quality that I have yet seen. I traded in my Special Edition DVD of this movie for the Blu-Ray version with the expectation that the new version would have high-definition video and at least a few of the Special Edition's extras. Not so. The video is very grainy and spotty, almost like watching a videotape recorded in a theater with the camera pointed at the screen. The disk includes a single featurette and none of the commentaries or other extras that were included in the Special Edition. If you possibly can, don't buy -- wait for a fully remastered and restored Blu-Ray which includes the commentaries. | ||
| Total Recall | ||
![]() | "Great movie, very poor Blu-Ray quality -- grainy picture, few extras" | 2009-06-28 |
| Fantastic movie, but this is the poorest-quality Blu-Ray image quality that I have yet seen. I traded in my Special Edition DVD of this movie for the Blu-Ray version with the expectation that the new version would have high-definition video and at least a few of the Special Edition's extras. Not so. The video is very grainy and spotty, almost like watching a videotape recorded in a theater with the camera pointed at the screen. The disk includes a single featurette and none of the commentaries or other extras that were included in the Special Edition. If you possibly can, don't buy -- wait for a fully remastered and restored Blu-Ray which includes the commentaries. | ||
| Charlie's Angels (Superbit Deluxe) | ||
![]() | "Very entertaining, weakened by corrupt plot" | 2009-01-09 |
| Charlie's Angels successfully updates the 1970s TV show while remaining faithful to the show's themes of female empowerment, sex-appeal, action, and superficial plot. The music is hip (for the year 2000); the pacing and camerawork are performed much like a high-energy music video by director McG. And -- much like the TV show -- the talented cast compensates for a contrived script. The special features include commentary by director McG, who provides a solid rationale for the audience-pleasing tactics that he employed to complete each scene, and he recalls the mild objections of cast members to many of the script's stupidest moments. A decade later, the movie still feels current and entertaining, and I enjoy watching it. That being said, the plot isn't just ludicrous but downright corrupt, if a viewer thinks seriously about what is happening: The angels become mercenary dupes who, without any due diligence, help an evil Bill Gates-type character (Sam Rockwell) try to kill his Steve Jobs-type rival (Tim Curry) and steal Jobs' technology. Halfway through the movie, the angels realize (duh!) that they've been recklessly helping the wrong side. But instead of facing justice for their role as accomplices, the angels become vigilantes and try to even the score with the Bill Gates character. Reckless attempts to kill two software industry leaders are transformed through hip music and funny, sexy actresses into a heroism. Acchhem. Make no mistake, the movie is a blast to watch and hear, but just maybe we should think just a little about the message that it conveys, especially to teen-agers? | ||
| Charlie's Angels | ||
![]() | "Very entertaining, weakened by corrupt plot" | 2009-01-09 |
| Charlie's Angels successfully updates the 1970s TV show while remaining faithful to the show's themes of female empowerment, sex-appeal, action, and superficial plot. The music is hip (for the year 2000); the pacing and camerawork are performed much like a high-energy music video by director McG. And -- much like the TV show -- the talented cast compensates for a contrived script. The special features include commentary by director McG, who provides a solid rationale for the audience-pleasing tactics that he employed to complete each scene, and he recalls the mild objections of cast members to many of the script's stupidest moments. A decade later, the movie still feels current and entertaining, and I enjoy watching it. That being said, the plot isn't just ludicrous but downright corrupt, if a viewer thinks seriously about what is happening: The angels become mercenary dupes who, without any due diligence, help an evil Bill Gates-type character (Sam Rockwell) try to kill his Steve Jobs-type rival (Tim Curry) and steal Jobs' technology. Halfway through the movie, the angels realize (duh!) that they've been recklessly helping the wrong side. But instead of facing justice for their role as accomplices, the angels become vigilantes and try to even the score with the Bill Gates character. Reckless attempts to kill two software industry leaders are transformed through hip music and funny, sexy actresses into a heroism. Acchhem. Make no mistake, the movie is a blast to watch and hear, but just maybe we should think just a little about the message that it conveys, especially to teen-agers? | ||
| Charlie's Angels (PSP-DVD) | ||
![]() | "Very entertaining, weakened by corrupt plot" | 2009-01-09 |
| Charlie's Angels successfully updates the 1970s TV show while remaining faithful to the show's themes of female empowerment, sex-appeal, action, and superficial plot. The music is hip (for the year 2000); the pacing and camerawork are performed much like a high-energy music video by director McG. And -- much like the TV show -- the talented cast compensates for a contrived script. The special features include commentary by director McG, who provides a solid rationale for the audience-pleasing tactics that he employed to complete each scene, and he recalls the mild objections of cast members to many of the script's stupidest moments. A decade later, the movie still feels current and entertaining, and I enjoy watching it. That being said, the plot isn't just ludicrous but downright corrupt, if a viewer thinks seriously about what is happening: The angels become mercenary dupes who, without any due diligence, help an evil Bill Gates-type character (Sam Rockwell) try to kill his Steve Jobs-type rival (Tim Curry) and steal Jobs' technology. Halfway through the movie, the angels realize (duh!) that they've been recklessly helping the wrong side. But instead of facing justice for their role as accomplices, the angels become vigilantes and try to even the score with the Bill Gates character. Reckless attempts to kill two software industry leaders are transformed through hip music and funny, sexy actresses into a heroism. Acchhem. Make no mistake, the movie is a blast to watch and hear, but just maybe we should think just a little about the message that it conveys, especially to teen-agers? | ||
| Los Angeles de Charlie (Charlie's Angels) | ||
![]() | "Very entertaining, weakened by corrupt plot" | 2009-01-09 |
| Charlie's Angels successfully updates the 1970s TV show while remaining faithful to the show's themes of female empowerment, sex-appeal, action, and superficial plot. The music is hip (for the year 2000); the pacing and camerawork are performed much like a high-energy music video by director McG. And -- much like the TV show -- the talented cast compensates for a contrived script. The special features include commentary by director McG, who provides a solid rationale for the audience-pleasing tactics that he employed to complete each scene, and he recalls the mild objections of cast members to many of the script's stupidest moments. A decade later, the movie still feels current and entertaining, and I enjoy watching it. That being said, the plot isn't just ludicrous but downright corrupt, if a viewer thinks seriously about what is happening: The angels become mercenary dupes who, without any due diligence, help an evil Bill Gates-type character (Sam Rockwell) try to kill his Steve Jobs-type rival (Tim Curry) and steal Jobs' technology. Halfway through the movie, the angels realize (duh!) that they've been recklessly helping the wrong side. But instead of facing justice for their role as accomplices, the angels become vigilantes and try to even the score with the Bill Gates character. Reckless attempts to kill two software industry leaders are transformed through hip music and funny, sexy actresses into a heroism. Acchhem. Make no mistake, the movie is a blast to watch and hear, but just maybe we should think just a little about the message that it conveys, especially to teen-agers? | ||
| Charlie's Angels | ||
![]() | "Very entertaining, weakened by corrupt plot" | 2009-01-09 |
| Charlie's Angels successfully updates the 1970s TV show while remaining faithful to the show's themes of female empowerment, sex-appeal, action, and superficial plot. The music is hip (for the year 2000); the pacing and camerawork are performed much like a high-energy music video by director McG. And -- much like the TV show -- the talented cast compensates for a contrived script. The special features include commentary by director McG, who provides a solid rationale for the audience-pleasing tactics that he employed to complete each scene, and he recalls the mild objections of cast members to many of the script's stupidest moments. A decade later, the movie still feels current and entertaining, and I enjoy watching it. That being said, the plot isn't just ludicrous but downright corrupt, if a viewer thinks seriously about what is happening: The angels become mercenary dupes who, without any due diligence, help an evil Bill Gates-type character (Sam Rockwell) try to kill his Steve Jobs-type rival (Tim Curry) and steal Jobs' technology. Halfway through the movie, the angels realize (duh!) that they've been recklessly helping the wrong side. But instead of facing justice for their role as accomplices, the angels become vigilantes and try to even the score with the Bill Gates character. Reckless attempts to kill two software industry leaders are transformed through hip music and funny, sexy actresses into a heroism. Acchhem. Make no mistake, the movie is a blast to watch and hear, but just maybe we should think just a little about the message that it conveys, especially to teen-agers? | ||
| Jesus Christ Superstar | ||
![]() | "Jesus meets GQ" | 2008-02-08 |
| Visually and musically stunning, this well-acted stage production of JCS seems less a re-imagination than a tribute to the earlier productions.
Adorned in pricey fashions, beautifully lit, and blessed with perfect Broadway-dancer physical features, the mostly male cast is reminiscent of Details Magazine or Abercrombie ads. Many people (including me) find that rendition of modernity unrealistic and contrary to the poverty of Jesus' times, but thanks to excellent staging and photography, the concept is brilliantly executed. The script, songs and timing of the new JCS closely follow the original with little noticeable variation. And like the original production, this one lacks rootedness in the Jewish faith of Jesus and his followers -- but then, so do most productions about Jesus. One big break with the 1973 movie is in setting: The original movie was set in gritty, desolate Holy Land locations. The new movie is set in a clean, expensive-looking, post-modern urban plaza. Another break: Jerome Pradon's courageous and emotional (if sometimes melodramatic) new take on Judas. Glenn Carter is effective as Jesus, especially at crucifixion; unfortunately, some critics will never be pleased with performances of Jesus that are performed by human actors -- or sung by men with a voice pitch any higher than Rambo. This production unfortunately forfeited the opportunity to connect JCS to historical or present-day politics of religious hypocrisy and occupation -- forces that prompted the crucifixion. Jesus' persecutors are instead portrayed as fictitious Goth fascist egotists with no plausible real-world equivalent. I give this movie four stars for its dazzling production values, music, acting, and execution of a concept: Jesus of Nazareth meets Abercrombie and GQ. I subtract a star for the absence of religious and political metaphor: A serious flaw, but one carried over from previous productions. | ||
| Jesus Christ Superstar - Broadway | ||
![]() | "Jesus meets GQ" | 2008-02-08 |
| Visually and musically stunning, this stage-acted production of JCS seems less a re-imagination than a refitting of the original in contemporary high fashion and music video.
Comparing this production to the 1973 movie is, in some ways, like comparing apples to oranges: The acting in a stage production will always differ substantially from the same roles acted in a movie, the former being inherently melodramatic to reach a theater audience, and the latter being subdued for the cameras (and refined through multiple retakes of a scene). Adorned in pricey attire, beautifully lit, buff and moisturized, the cast of this JCS is reminiscent of Details Magazine or Abercrombie ads: Uniformly attractive and, due to their spotless appearance, artificial. Many fans of the original JCS (including me) may find this Madison Avenue version of modernity unrealistic and contrary to the poverty and rugged living conditions of Jesus' times as well as the present-day Middle East. But the intent of this production was to make JCS ultra-contemporary for a post-MTV generation. Thanks to minimalist set design and excellent photography, the ultra-contemporary concept is well-executed. The script, songs and timing of the new JCS closely follow the original with little noticeable variation. And like the original production, this one lacks rootedness in the Jewish faith of Jesus and his followers -- but then, so do most productions about Jesus. One big break with the 1973 movie is in setting: The original movie was set in gritty, desolate Holy Land locations. The new movie is set in a clean, expensive-looking, post-modern urban plaza that lacks historical context. Another break: Jerome Pradon's courageous and vulnerable (if sometimes melodramatic) new take on an insecure and emotionally wounded Judas. Glenn Carter is satisfactory as Jesus, especially at crucifixion, though at times his performance (like his fellow cast members) is too smooth, glamorous, and "theatrical" for such emotionally and physically traumatic circumstances. Like its predecessors, this production forfeited the opportunity to connect JCS to historical or present-day politics of religious hypocrisy and occupation -- forces that prompted the crucifixion. Jesus' persecutors are instead portrayed as fictitious Goth fascist egotists with no plausible real-world equivalent. I give this movie three-and-a-half stars for its dazzling production values, music, casting, and execution of a concept: Jesus of Nazareth meets contemporary fashion and personal expression. I subtract a star-and-a-half for overemphasis on fashion, absence of religious and political context, and performances that try a little TOO hard (at times) to be theatrical. | ||
| Unzipped | ||
![]() | "Unsung heroes" | 2007-12-12 |
| In 1995, Isaac Mizrahi, his A-list supermodels, and celebs like Sandra Bernhard were a fabulous sight to see working behind the scenes. How would they interact? Where does each find key inspiration? What past events brought them to this position? What do they wear? Are they as nice as they appear? We learn all this and more.
But a decade later, I am more fascinated at the quiet presence in this movie of people who have since become semi-famous: Robert Best, from Season 3 of Project Runway, is present throughout Unzipped as Mizrahi's unsung assistant. Tricia Helfer of Battlestar Galactica and Padma Lakshmi of Top Chef appear as then-unknown models. Mizrahi praises another ever-present assistant, Nina, but we learn little about her. Thanks to shows and movies such as Project Runway, The Devil Wears Prada, and Ugly Betty, audiences know more about fashion than they did in 1994. And so, while respecting that only so much ground could be covered in one movie, I am left wanting to know a bit more about the activities and inspirations of the workers that made Mizrahi's success possible. This information as well as followup information about Mizrahi and the supermodels could have been provided as extras on the DVD but sadly, the DVD has no extras. | ||
| Unzipped | ||
![]() | "Unsung heroes" | 2007-12-12 |
| In 1995, Isaac Mizrahi, his A-list supermodels, and celebs like Sandra Bernhard were a fabulous sight to see working behind the scenes. How would they interact? Where does each find key inspiration? What past events brought them to this position? What do they wear? Are they as nice as they appear? We learn all this and more. But a decade later, I am more fascinated at the quiet presence in this movie of people who have since become semi-famous: Robert Best, from Season 3 of Project Runway, is present throughout Unzipped as Mizrahi's unsung assistant. Tricia Helfer of Battlestar Galactica and Padma Lakshmi of Top Chef appear as then-unknown models. Mizrahi praises another ever-present assistant, Nina, but we learn little about her. Thanks to shows and movies such as Project Runway, The Devil Wears Prada, and Ugly Betty, audiences know more about fashion than they did in 1994. And so, while respecting that only so much ground could be covered in one movie, I am left wanting to know a bit more about the activities and inspirations of the workers that made Mizrahi's success possible. This information as well as followup information about Mizrahi and the supermodels could have been provided as extras on the DVD but sadly, the DVD has no extras. | ||
| La Femme Nikita - The Complete First Three Seasons | ||
![]() | "Defines the post-9/11 era. Top-notch script. cast. and music" | 2006-01-15 |
| Ahead of its time when it began in 1997, La Femme Nikita is "Mission Impossible," "Alias," and "24" wrapped up in one show that transcends political and cultural boundaries. During its run, it also broke ground for its hip selection of alternative music. The show provides well-developed and overlapping story lines; intelligent characters with complicated and wounded souls; cutting-edge wardrobe and set design; and the realistic portrayal of a world in which conflicting Western values, not just American ones, are weighed against one another. LFN draws attention to the moral ambiguities we face in a global war on terror. Still ahead of its time today, it asks us to weigh the consequences of actions we choose in battling terror -- consequences for our own moral standing, our liberties, our very lives. The DVD set is worth buying for the original series alone, but it includes numerous behind-the-scenes extras and commentaries that add even more value. | ||
| Cassandra Crossing | ||
![]() | "Above-average disaster flick, surprising cast choices" | 2002-06-30 |
| Cassandra Crossing may be noteworthy mainly because it was one of legendary acting coach Lee Strasberg's last few movies -- and one of Martin Sheen's first. Sophia Loren, Richard Harris, Burt Lancaster and Strasberg offer decent performances; of course, they could act out a flick such as this in their sleep. Cassandra Crossing was dismissed by its critics as an all-star disaster movie set in the improbable location of a train. In fact, this is an action movie with a bit of international intrigue -- and it is a movie noteworthy for its decidedly older-than-average cast members. Cassandra Crossing enjoyed some box office success in Britain, Italy, and Germany. It was granted little publicity in America, however -- perhaps because of its overseas setting, perhaps because the plot line is cynical in its treatment of American foreign-policy and military intentions. The script behind this movie is weak at times. There are stock characters, average dialogue, and questionable casting -- Ava Gardner essentially plays herself, and O.J. Simpson plays a cop. Thankfully, their roles are small. Some of the special effects on board the train are quite good; elsewhere, they are low-budget. Lancaster's role in particular is undermined by cheap sets and his character's implausible decisions. Despite the script, formulaic plot line, and very unconventional assortment of characters, the movie is suspenseful. If only Amtrak were this exciting. | ||
| Tunnelvision | ||
![]() | "No DVD extras / 70s comedy, love it or hate it" | 2002-06-17 |
| Tunnelvision accurately mocks -- or perhaps it just reflects -- tasteless mid-Seventies TV programming. A disclaimer suggests that the film parodies the era's rampant on-screen sexism and assorted prejudices, but the script lacks the edginess needed to accomplish this successfully. Mid-Seventies television was, let's face it, even schlockier than Fox is today. The writers and comedians behind Tunnelvision -- fresh from Second City Television (SCTV) and not yet honed through SNL -- knew TV was tasteless. But regrettably, their early effort at parody is often more cynicism than wit. We're supposed to laugh when a "Spy TV" victim kills himself, giggle every time a male news anchor tries to shack up with compliant "weather girl," roar with delight when a nearly naked Betty Thomas must pass gas to win a game show, and gasp at unexpected racial profanities. The political vision behind Tunnelvision is much funnier: The film takes sharp, well-executed jabs at Israel, Exxon, air pollution, phone companies, political mudslinging, and a sporty new national anthem punctuated by nuclear missiles. These "news" items are well worth seeing, and the DVD format lets the viewer skip the stuff in between. Ultimately, Tunnelvision's theme -- TV on trial -- is a well-crafted excuse to string together 70 minutes of SCTV skits and SNL-style fake commercials. Tunnelvision offers us a worthwhile glimpse at countless great comedians' humble beginnings, and it reminds us of an era that was coarser, more troubled, more cynical, and less hip than the fantasy depicted in "That 70s Show." DVD buyers please note: While it lets you skip to the good skits, the DVD format also exposes Tunnelvision's low-budget video and audio production quality. | ||
| New York September 11 | ||
![]() | "Off the beaten path" | 2002-05-25 |
| The book is a suitable supplement to one's books on September 11. It contains few of the newspaper and magazine photographs that became the official historial record of the catastrophe. Instead, it features the work of free-lancers who had to work without the benefit of helicopters, film crews, and satellite imaging. The result is a startling portrait of the disaster's impact on spectators and the neighborhoods around New York. Magnum has captured the best photographs available anywhere of the actual ruins -- twisted steel and concrete, towering piles of rubble, nearby buildings shattered and on fire, streets buried in ash and singed paper. This advantage over other books came, perhaps, at an ethical cost: Photographers snuck past cordons and disobeyed police orders in order to capture the aftermath on film. The book doesn't say it, but some photographers (not necessarily those in the book) were arrested. This book doesn't contain the key photographs that came to define the event, but it's a more-than-worthy supplement to such a book. And it's a vivid reflection of the obstacles and opportunities that photojournalists encounter in covering breaking news. | ||
| Viking 128 MB CompactFlash Card | ||
![]() | "Does its job well" | 2001-12-28 |
| Easily installed in my PDA, this little chip lets me store hours' worth of MP3s for portable listening. I can also use it in my digicam to store hundreds of photos at a time. Voila! No more lugging a PC or PDA every time I plan to take pictures. | ||
| A*Teens - DVD Collection | ||
![]() | "Fantastic features for a music DVD" | 2001-12-28 |
| The seven Dolby digital videos would alone have justified the price, in my opinion, but the DVD's extras go way above the call of duty. I'm by no means an A*Teens groupie (I'm 36!) and I had not heard their post-Abba-revival material. So the discography gave me a chance to sample songs that I would not have heard otherwise, unless I stole them from Napster. I'm more likely to buy their second CD as a result. The group interview was well done -- all four band members got equal time to speak, and did so spontaneously. I felt they proved their potential to be thoughtful, intelligent, world-class performers. Finally, simple elements like the DVD menus -- so frequently done wrong on other DVDs, with jarring and noisy effects or awkward navigation -- were easy to use and fun to watch. | ||
| Looker | ||
![]() | "Surprising if misogynistic vision of modern TV ads" | 2001-11-10 |
| "Looker" offers an intelligent analysis of crass corporate marketing and the potential misuse of digital animation. It will interest viewers to see how this movie's technologies, envisioned back at the dawn of the IBM PC, have become near-reality. Susan Dey offers a standout performance in a movie that's unfortunately burdened with stock characters and mediocre dialogue. In her role as a TV ad model chased by a murderous conglomerate, she projects some of the charm and sensitivity that won her fans in L.A. Law a few years later. Given that many of the models in this movie are reduced to disposable bimbos, Dey brings a good deal more intelligence than (probably) her role originally required. Leigh Taylor-Young also brings a commanding and intelligent presence to her role as a villain alongside James Coburn. This movie has strong redeeming moments: An auto chase and a variety of burglaries are done in highly innovative fashion, Coburn is excellent as a Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde CEO, Finney is low key in his male-hero come-to-the-rescue role, and the technologies (sans hypnosis) all too real. Unfortunately, some viewers may be offended at the movie's superficial and violently misogynistic portrayal of female actors. Make no mistake, the dialogue in this movie is a bit schmaltzy, the TV ads are laughably bad, and a key question is unresolved: While it's clear that sexy models are being digitized and animated to achieve perfect on-screen performance in typically expensive TV commercials, we never learn why Coburn and Taylor-Young are murdering the models. Nevertheless, the movie smartly analyzes the values underlying television ad production and the potential for forgery of what we see and hear on TV shows of any kind. "Looker" lacks the star power and cutting-edge topic of other Crichton movies. But if you like intelligent sci-fi themes with sexy women and moderate violence, and if you can forgive the dialogue, you may appreciate the subtler points of "Looker." | ||
| Casio Cassiopeia EM-500 Color Pocket PC | ||
![]() | "High quality, limited expandability" | 2001-09-11 |
| I purchased the EM500 as my first PDA, along with a 64MB MMC card. The card allows me to store vast amounts of data and music on MMC, compensating somewhat for the barebones 16 MB of RAM permitted in this device. Due to technological changes by Microsoft, the EM-500 and most other Pocket PCs on the market as of August 2001 cannot be upgraded to the new Windows Pocket PC 2002 operating system. Assuming you need to buy a PDA before the new generation of Pocket PC 2002 PDAs reaches the market, the EM-500 is a great choice. The video quality is excellent. The unit design is simple, sturdy and elegant. The included applications are more than sufficient for the average PDA or MP3 user. The success of the character and handwriting recognition software in translating simple messages was a pleasant surprise. For added convenience, buy Casio's EM500 docking cradle. | ||
| Memento | ||
![]() | "DVD version's pluses and minuses" | 2001-09-11 |
| Ditto what everyone else said about the theatrical version's outstanding cast, direction, and screenplay. This review instead will focus on the DVD's bonus content. For a DVD, the added content -- one TV interview with the director, widescreen format, Dolby audio, digital video, small picture gallery -- is unexceptional. For a movie of Memento's artistic stature, a secondary soundtrack featuring commentary by the cast and director would have been greatly appreciated. I did discover one worthwhile goodie: Buried amid the DVD features is a collection of fictitious newspaper articles and doctors' reports that cast the main character of the movie in still another surprising new light. | ||
| Kodak Lithium Ion Battery and Charger for DC4800 | ||
![]() | "Flimsy" | 2001-09-04 |
| This charger is speedy and compact -- necessities for effective picture-taking. But the plug (which pivots out from the unit to plug into a wall) is flimsy. After only five months of occasional use, the pivot came loose and now the plug doesn't carry power into the charger. So I can waste time getting warranty service, or I can spend $80 for a new charger. | ||
| How to Win Friends, Kick Ass, and Influence People | ||
![]() | "Entertaining anecdotes from CNN" | 2001-06-25 |
| This book appropriately glosses over Russell's private life and manages to balance professionalism, entertainment, assertion, humor and sometimes sarcasm about life at CNN -- the silly things some viewers or youthful subordinates will say and do, the surprising things a famous anchor will do when stuck in a brutal Atlanta traffic jam during scheduled airtime. Luckily, Russell's perspective extends well beyond her CNN duties to reflect on her role as a go-getter and as a woman in her numerous other ongoing careers. While she has no doubt inspired many women over the years to live uncompromisingly for one's goals and dreams, she also has inspired men like me -- from an early age -- to see career women as well-rounded, smart, savvy, and critical to an organization's success. At CNN and in her book, Lynne Russell has helped make professional journalism sexy to a new generation, male and female. | ||
| Homosexuality: The Use of Scientific Research in the Church's Moral Debate | ||
![]() | "Thorough discussion of homosexuality, flawed theology" | 2001-06-25 |
| Jones and Yarhouse's comprehensive discussion of the science of homosexuality is welcome and long overdue. In particular, the authors touch upon a subject -- ex-gays -- that both liberal and conservative activists have avoided addressing scientifically because the facts reflect poorly on the claims of both sides. This book makes no claim to be unbiased. The authors do impose a conservative Protestant filter upon their evaluations and commentaries. This results in extensive discussion of "the" (singular) Christian sexual ethic which completely excludes Catholic and liberal or independent Protestant perspectives on sexual ethics. The authors also succumb to caricatures of positions with which they disagree; they periodically stereotype the proponents of alternative ethical frameworks as well as the widely differing perspectives of gay-tolerant Christian and gay-tolerant non-Christian scientists, clergy and civil-rights activists. Overall the book is a useful addition to the discussion of the science of sexuality within a conservative Protestant framework. | ||
| Kodak DC4800 Zoom Expansion Pack | ||
![]() | "Great charger. Bag is nice but could be improved a bit" | 2001-06-25 |
| A great deal overall. The charger is super and the spare battery is a necessity. The bag is big enough for the camera, instruction manual, spare battery and USB cable, but the fit is a bit awkward. I would have preferred a snug, molded fit for the camera and a bit more room for the manual. As it is, I had to insert the manual diagonally in an oddly sized pocket, wasting some space. | ||
| Jon & Vangelis - Private Collection | ||
![]() | "Great New Age album for the early 1980s" | 2001-06-25 |
| Both Jon Anderson and Vangelis were niche artists; Anderson's high-pitched voice and Vangelis' powerful and spontaneous work with early synthesizers appealed to unique segments of the post-ELO synth-rock markets. "Private Collection" combines the two perfectly. A friend pointed the album out to me at about the time that Yes' 90125 was hitting the charts. While Yes offered 1983 radio fans an energetic, hard edge and ironic lyrics, Collection offered in-the-know New Age music fans a wonderful little package of love songs and generic spiritual inspiration. While I love edgy pop music and classic rock, I actually preferred Collection over 90125. Since then, Enya has greatly updated and modernized the Anderson/Vangelis approach while adding an authentic cultural context to the sound. But if you're curious to hear an early male-duo predecessor to the Enya musical style, Private Collection is a suitable choice. | ||
| © 2009 GoSale.com (S2) |






